The expert's testimony must be grounded in an accepted body of learning or experience in the expert's field, and the expert must explain how the conclusion is so grounded.

Federal Rule of Evidence 702 addresses the testimony of expert witnesses in legal proceedings. Here’s a summary and explanation: Qualifications of Expert Witnesses: The rule requires that …

he trial court must use to assess the reliability and helpfulness of proffered expert testimony. Consistently with Kumho, the Rule as amended provides that all types of expert testimony …

Jan 30, 2024 · The federal rule of evidence governing expert testimony — Rule 702 — just saw its most significant change in almost 25 years. The new Rule 702, which went into effect Dec. 1, …

The use of the term “expert” in the Rule does not, however, mean that a jury should actually be informed that a qualified witness is testifying as an “expert.” Indeed, there is much to be said …

Jun 18, 2024 · What is the difference between lay witness and expert witness testimony? Lay witness testimony is based on personal knowledge and observations, while expert witness …

May 12, 2025 · Federal Rule of Evidence 702 sets forth the standard for admissibility of expert testimony. In December 2023, an amendment to Rule 702 took effect, following fervent debate …

Sep 25, 2025 · This guide explains the key restrictions placed on expert witnesses, how they affect admissibility, and what attorneys should know when preparing or challenging expert …

Campagnolo points out two recent cases that indicate just how decisive expert testimony can be and the pitfalls that can occur when experts omit information crucial for the jury’s understanding.

Feb 1, 2025 · The proponent of expert testimony must establish the foundational requirements for admissibility, and the judge, as the “gatekeeper” of the evidence, must make a threshold …