Google has reached a settlement over a lawsuit that claimed it illegally collected data from children without parental ...

The Washington Examiner won an appeal last week in a lawsuit that accused the newspaper of violating privacy rights of ...

A broad reading of the statute, and the meaning of 'consumer,' would create the risk for a lot of liability for a lot of ...

But the privacy implications can be a lot more significant in some cases. Think about how the videos you watch could reveal your medical information, say, or your sexual orientation.

Note however, that the video needs to be pre-recorded as per the statute. Since livestreamed video is not, that content falls outside of the VPPA. See e.g., Louth v.

From Magistrate Judge Virginia DeMarchi's opinion last week in M.K. v. Google LLC (N.D. Cal.): The following facts are based on the allegations of the FAC [First Amended Complaint]. In 2020, M.K ...

It’s currently a crime to hold onto old video viewing records for too long and to disclose this private information. Just one problem: In the rush to pass the legislation, Congress completely ...

Most people would rather not have their video viewing habits easily available to the public — no need for co-workers to know about your love of reality TV.